Total Conservation Programs in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 128

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $1,177,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2021
21Debne C GregoryGeorgetown, TX 78628$23,397
22Wayne A FindleyIredell, TX 76649$23,397
23John E SchuelkeSmithville, TX 78957$19,238
24Brenda PhillipsBay Minette, AL 36507$18,989
25The Blankenship Partnership LtdPlainview, TX 79073$16,072
26Gussett Land Development IncKerrville, TX 78028$15,177
27Phil DrakeMillersview, TX 76862$12,803
28Lonnie Dean ClarkLafayette, LA 70503$12,697
29Judy MatthewsSan Angelo, TX 76901$11,773
30John A Didway IIIBrownfield, TX 79316$11,610
31Willie G Davis Estate Gst Fbo William Malcom DavisRuidoso, NM 88345$11,526
32Willie G Davis Estate Gst Fbo Denise D SmithRuidoso, NM 88345$11,526
33Willie G Davis Estate Gst Fbo Lesli D DolgenerRuidoso, NM 88345$11,526
34Ernest ThorntonAndrews, TX 79714$11,352
35Joann L PflugerEden, TX 76837$9,403
36Michael EthridgeGraford, TX 76449$6,929
37Veribest Cattle Feeders IncVeribest, TX 76886$6,879
38Willie R SilerSan Angelo, TX 76904$6,574
39Joy M StoverTexarkana, TX 75503$6,434
40Darla J Sellers Irrevocable Asset TrustFort Worth, TX 76108$5,834

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag