Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 15th District of Texas (Rep. Vicente Gonzalez), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 64
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 15th District of Texas (Rep. Vicente Gonzalez) totaled $218,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Marcus N Guerra | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $1,008 |
42 | Juan A Perez Jr | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $725 |
43 | Ramon Huerta Jr | Encino, TX 78353 | $716 |
44 | Mario Villarreal | Encino, TX 78353 | $711 |
45 | Jose Ovidio Garza | Encino, TX 78353 | $514 |
46 | Maria S Cuellar | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $486 |
47 | Genaro Baldemar Perez | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $486 |
48 | Luis Arevalo | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $477 |
49 | Rolando Gutierrez | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $446 |
50 | Felix Barrera Jr | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $428 |
51 | David B Almquist | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $416 |
52 | Emilio Escalante | Encino, TX 78353 | $342 |
53 | Irma Ramirez | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $257 |
54 | Gilda A Gutierrez | Encino, TX 78353 | $252 |
55 | Ruben P Garza | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $243 |
56 | Hector Lee Perez | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $171 |
57 | Jair Martinez | Corpus Christi, TX 78411 | $161 |
58 | Omar Pena | Premont, TX 78375 | $140 |
59 | Andrew Valdez | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $126 |
60 | Javier Pena Jr | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $126 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”