Direct Payment Program in 15th District of Texas (Rep. Vicente Gonzalez), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 144
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 15th District of Texas (Rep. Vicente Gonzalez) totaled $1,318,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jose Amado Perez | Encino, TX 78353 | $961 |
82 | Humberto Gonzalez | Premont, TX 78375 | $896 |
83 | Anna S Kibbe Dba Kibbe Ranch | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $887 |
84 | Roel Villarreal | Encino, TX 78353 | $871 |
85 | Neftali B Zelaya | Premont, TX 78375 | $870 |
86 | Romeo Chavana Dba Chavana Farm An | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $798 |
87 | Macario Rodriguez | Encino, TX 78353 | $762 |
88 | William & Bette Arnold Family Ltd | Pharr, TX 78577 | $728 |
89 | Audelia Chavana Longoria | Corpus Christi, TX 78415 | $727 |
90 | Carl G Powell | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $714 |
91 | Elena Villarreal | Encino, TX 78353 | $702 |
92 | John Huerta | Alice, TX 78333 | $676 |
93 | Rene Venecia | Alice, TX 78332 | $637 |
94 | Mary Lee Stockton | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $636 |
95 | Alfredo Hinojosa Jr | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $628 |
96 | Maria G Hinojosa | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $609 |
97 | Merardo Villarreal | Encino, TX 78353 | $568 |
98 | Johnny Neth | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $544 |
99 | Ronnie Zahn | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $435 |
100 | Ezequiel Perez Estate | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”