Conservation Reserve Program in 19th District of Texas (Rep. Jodey Arrington), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 12,408
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 19th District of Texas (Rep. Jodey Arrington) totaled $830,540,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Horace Hutton | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $746,498 |
102 | Scott Simpson | Morton, TX 79346 | $744,979 |
103 | Sam Damron | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $737,862 |
104 | Leonard Orville Coleman | Houston, TX 77094 | $730,951 |
105 | James L Means Jr | Ropesville, TX 79358 | $730,372 |
106 | Eric Silhan | Morton, TX 79346 | $726,783 |
107 | L-seven LLC | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $726,724 |
108 | Red-land Farms Inc | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $725,829 |
109 | Bobie D Miller | Spring, TX 77388 | $718,166 |
110 | Robert Irving Loe | Canyon, TX 79015 | $714,793 |
111 | Winfred Jim Young | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $714,387 |
112 | Tommy Guy Box | Plains, TX 79355 | $711,495 |
113 | James Harrison | Fort Worth, TX 76102 | $707,176 |
114 | Martha W Spradley | Anton, TX 79313 | $706,090 |
115 | Baileyboro Farms Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $705,255 |
116 | Buddy Greener | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $703,468 |
117 | The Weldon Newsom Family Trust B | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $702,730 |
118 | Double Mountain Fork Farms Inc | Littlefield, TX 79339 | $696,963 |
119 | Ray Duke | Oak Point, TX 75068 | $696,895 |
120 | Carolyn Widner | Bovina, TX 79009 | $694,289 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”