Emergency Conservation Program in 19th District of Texas (Rep. Jodey Arrington), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 508
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 19th District of Texas (Rep. Jodey Arrington) totaled $2,195,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Maedelle Miller Tr | Post, TX 79356 | $9,445 |
62 | Nance Brothers Ptnshp | Fort Worth, TX 76179 | $9,427 |
63 | Johnnie F Norman | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $9,189 |
64 | Longhorn Valley Clegg Partnership | Wayside, TX 79094 | $9,027 |
65 | Freddie M Stuart | Sylvester, TX 79560 | $8,951 |
66 | John Woodward | Tarzan, TX 79783 | $8,912 |
67 | Branch 9/ Ranches Ltd | Rotan, TX 79546 | $8,792 |
68 | David M Estes | Sylvester, TX 79560 | $8,685 |
69 | Edward M Ekdahl | Stamford, TX 79553 | $8,210 |
70 | Rr & S Farms Inc | Hamlin, TX 79520 | $8,097 |
71 | Hearne Steel Co Inc | Hearne, TX 77859 | $7,909 |
72 | Spining Marital Non-exempt Trust | Newport Beach, CA 92660 | $7,900 |
73 | Jerry Ray Mueller | Stamford, TX 79553 | $7,850 |
74 | Charles R Clark | Rule, TX 79547 | $7,782 |
75 | Edward Lee Thornburg | Roby, TX 79543 | $7,769 |
76 | Branch Cattle Co | Rotan, TX 79546 | $7,504 |
77 | Wayland Foster Ranch Partnership | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $7,488 |
78 | Charles J Schwertner | Abilene, TX 79602 | $7,447 |
79 | Giles W Dalby | Post, TX 79356 | $7,390 |
80 | Gregory L Pruitt | Rotan, TX 79546 | $7,292 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”