Counter Cyclical Program in 23rd District of Texas (Rep. Will Hurd), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 804
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 23rd District of Texas (Rep. Will Hurd) totaled $40,876,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Pearcy Operating Corp | Midland, TX 79707 | $128,495 |
102 | Georgia Rosa J V | Turner, OR 97392 | $125,720 |
103 | Manjeet K Sandhu | Tracy, CA 95304 | $120,105 |
104 | Patricia Lee Hutchison | Dilley, TX 78017 | $119,266 |
105 | Ted & Murlene Godfrey Jv | Pecos, TX 79772 | $119,234 |
106 | Inderjit K Sandhu | Tracy, CA 95304 | $118,583 |
107 | Ranbir K Sandhu | Tracy, CA 95304 | $116,378 |
108 | Gm Ag | San Antonio, TX 78217 | $116,330 |
109 | Sacaton Corporation | Balmorhea, TX 79718 | $115,813 |
110 | Ronald B Owens | La Porte, TX 77571 | $114,481 |
111 | H & K Land & Leasing | Uvalde, TX 78801 | $111,745 |
112 | Clayton Williams Farms Inc | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $111,496 |
113 | Scott Lee Holdeman | Saragosa, TX 79780 | $110,145 |
114 | Gusie D Heiser | Fredericksburg, TX 78624 | $108,709 |
115 | Iven A Neal | Pearsall, TX 78061 | $108,036 |
116 | James P Neal | Pearsall, TX 78061 | $105,682 |
117 | Caco Farms Inc | Arlington, TX 76012 | $104,029 |
118 | Roger Jones Dba Jones Farms | Pecos, TX 79772 | $103,742 |
119 | Crider Dairy Inc | Cisco, TX 76437 | $102,849 |
120 | Alyson M Hargrove Estate | Uvalde, TX 78801 | $101,760 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”