Total Commodity Programs in 27th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Cloud), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 4,078
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 27th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Cloud) totaled $528,193,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Daniel G Vyvial | Ganado, TX 77962 | $1,039,770 |
102 | Koop & Son | Edna, TX 77957 | $1,039,437 |
103 | Batchelder Farms | Palacios, TX 77465 | $1,028,674 |
104 | Moehle Farms | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,023,832 |
105 | Kelvin Morton Farms Jv | Edna, TX 77957 | $1,021,143 |
106 | Freddie Maresh | Austwell, TX 77950 | $1,017,963 |
107 | Matthew Bures II | Ganado, TX 77962 | $1,014,703 |
108 | Padre Farms Inc | Corpus Christi, TX 78468 | $1,009,295 |
109 | Lynn Kramer Farms | Ganado, TX 77962 | $1,006,104 |
110 | Jonathan J Malek | Ganado, TX 77962 | $1,002,055 |
111 | Steven Andel | Ganado, TX 77962 | $994,193 |
112 | Mark Malaer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $990,758 |
113 | Aleine A Stanford | Edna, TX 77957 | $988,063 |
114 | Lewis J Chanek | Ganado, TX 77962 | $983,151 |
115 | Dorothye E Naylor | Refugio, TX 78377 | $975,387 |
116 | Louis Wayne Neill | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $973,603 |
117 | Jamie R Bures | Ganado, TX 77962 | $972,839 |
118 | C & J Farms | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $972,390 |
119 | Jacklyn A Kubecka | Edna, TX 77957 | $971,379 |
120 | Heath Jason Bures | Ganado, TX 77962 | $968,987 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”