Cotton Ginning Program in 27th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Cloud), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 280
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in 27th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Cloud) totaled $1,692,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Andel Farms | Edna, TX 77957 | $31,544 |
22 | Floyd Niemann | Woodsboro, TX 78393 | $25,142 |
23 | Mordow Inc | Refugio, TX 78377 | $24,919 |
24 | Bruce & Devon White Jv | La Ward, TX 77970 | $23,196 |
25 | Rolyan Inc | Refugio, TX 78377 | $22,882 |
26 | Randolph L Vyvial | Ganado, TX 77962 | $22,644 |
27 | Daniel G Vyvial | Ganado, TX 77962 | $21,877 |
28 | Christopher L Hajovsky | Ganado, TX 77962 | $18,654 |
29 | Lauren Hajovsky | Ganado, TX 77962 | $18,654 |
30 | La Rosa Cattle Co LLC | Woodsboro, TX 78393 | $18,134 |
31 | Paul N Hunt Farms | Palacios, TX 77465 | $17,735 |
32 | Donald White | La Ward, TX 77970 | $15,877 |
33 | Melvin Howard Neill Jr | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $15,087 |
34 | Michael Eugene Barosh | El Campo, TX 77437 | $14,466 |
35 | Joseph E Nunley | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $13,264 |
36 | Kenneth Wayne Steindorf | Woodsboro, TX 78393 | $12,163 |
37 | Rodney Shane May | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $10,935 |
38 | Harold Dan May Farm Trust | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $8,723 |
39 | Albert L Malaer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $8,690 |
40 | Steven Andel | Ganado, TX 77962 | $8,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”