Production Flexibility Program in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 291
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar) totaled $8,266,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gilberto Garza Jr | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $23,282 |
62 | Thomas C Wheat | Corpus Christi, TX 78466 | $22,656 |
63 | Adalberto Garza | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $22,458 |
64 | Basilio D Villarreal Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $21,170 |
65 | Javier Solis | Delmita, TX 78536 | $20,573 |
66 | Neal J Alvarado | Delmita, TX 78536 | $20,235 |
67 | Luis F Alvarado | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $20,170 |
68 | Silverio Gabriel Saenz | Mission, TX 78573 | $19,757 |
69 | Jose G Longoria Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $19,671 |
70 | Jose G Longoria Sr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $19,671 |
71 | Raul Garza | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $19,378 |
72 | Eusebio Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $19,184 |
73 | J R Brock | Austin, TX 78701 | $18,935 |
74 | Felix S Garza | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $18,854 |
75 | Adolfo Garcia | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $18,358 |
76 | Verne Thomas Vanderpool | Alamo, TX 78516 | $17,201 |
77 | Guadalupe G Garza | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $16,317 |
78 | Miguel A Garcia | Grulla, TX 78548 | $15,022 |
79 | W I Cameron Trusts | Dallas, TX 75240 | $14,880 |
80 | Griffin & Brand Inc | Mcallen, TX 78505 | $14,551 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”