Farm Subsidy information
28th District of Texas
(Rep. Henry Cuellar)
Total Subsidies in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 492
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar) totaled $7,542,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jim I Mills Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $14,833 |
82 | Laura Mills Harrison | El Paso, TX 79932 | $14,833 |
83 | Guillermo Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $14,737 |
84 | Oscar Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $14,310 |
85 | , | $14,056 | |
86 | Norberto Salinas | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $13,555 |
87 | Minto Cattle Co | Laredo, TX 78045 | $13,551 |
88 | Omar Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $13,458 |
89 | Jorge D Perez | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $13,260 |
90 | Rafael Ricardo Ramirez | San Antonio, TX 78240 | $13,237 |
91 | Roberto De Leon-rodriguez | Mcallen, TX 78503 | $13,134 |
92 | Corydon J Kobernat | San Antonio, TX 78233 | $13,113 |
93 | Gregory G Kobernat | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $13,113 |
94 | Steven J Kobernat | San Antonio, TX 78210 | $13,113 |
95 | Anne M Littlefield | San Antonio, TX 78212 | $13,113 |
96 | , | $13,113 | |
97 | Jose Arturo Garza Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $12,635 |
98 | Manuel L Elizondo | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $12,521 |
99 | Omar Salinas | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $12,486 |
100 | Jorge Alberto Gonzalez | Roma, TX 78584 | $12,009 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”