Production Flexibility Program in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 291
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar) totaled $8,266,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | M & M Farms | Mission, TX 78572 | $13,622 |
82 | J M Martinez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $12,812 |
83 | Tbs Farms Inc | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $12,695 |
84 | Manuel L Elizondo | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $12,482 |
85 | Feliciano Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $12,231 |
86 | Manuel Garcia Jr | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $12,094 |
87 | A V Margo Family Trust | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $11,532 |
88 | Jose Garza Jr | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $11,407 |
89 | Gabriel G Rodriguez | Delmita, TX 78536 | $10,763 |
90 | Arcadio Salinas Jr | Grulla, TX 78548 | $10,734 |
91 | David Brock | Mountain View, CA 94040 | $10,650 |
92 | Stephen Brock | Austin, TX 78727 | $10,650 |
93 | Carolyn Vance Cook Trust | Mcallen, TX 78505 | $10,452 |
94 | Juan Diego Saenz | Grulla, TX 78548 | $10,190 |
95 | Joan Malechek | Barksdale, TX 78828 | $10,051 |
96 | Roel Barrera | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $9,178 |
97 | Esp Trust | Northbrook, IL 60062 | $8,444 |
98 | Hp Family Trust | Northbrook, IL 60062 | $8,442 |
99 | Cirio Conrado Rosa | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $8,367 |
100 | Gustavo Garza Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $8,284 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”