Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 225

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar) totaled $991,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
121Manuel OrtizLaredo, TX 78044$2,857
122Guadalupe T VillarrealBrownsville, TX 78520$2,800
123David CantuSan Juan, TX 78589$2,800
124Jorge D PerezMcallen, TX 78504$2,782
125Edmundo Escobar SrRio Grande City, TX 78582$2,779
126Baldomero BazanRio Grande City, TX 78582$2,772
127Romeo SalinasRio Grande City, TX 78582$2,598
128Ociel GuerraRio Grande City, TX 78582$2,596
129Heriberto Rodriguez JrEdinburg, TX 78539$2,536
130James R VolzLaredo, TX 78041$2,525
131Noel Eloy GonzalezRio Grande City, TX 78582$2,500
132Quina CorporationRio Grande City, TX 78582$2,500
133Benigno Garcia JrLaredo, TX 78045$2,498
134Ernesto J MartinezLaredo, TX 78042$2,474
135Vela Land & Cattle CoLaredo, TX 78045$2,473
136James H HeinLaredo, TX 78046$2,450
137Apollina M GuzmanMission, TX 78574$2,450
138Cesar GonzalezRoma, TX 78584$2,276
139Joel A GuerraRoma, TX 78584$2,239
140Ramiro Jaime FloresMission, TX 78574$2,188

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag