Total Commodity Programs in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 189
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar) totaled $125,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | C R Pena Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $157 |
122 | Raul Garza | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $157 |
123 | Ruben Roberto Guerra | Roma, TX 78584 | $157 |
124 | Fernando Garza | Roma, TX 78584 | $157 |
125 | Amaro Salinas | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $157 |
126 | Idolina Flores | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $157 |
127 | Placido Pena Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $149 |
128 | Maria Oralia Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $149 |
129 | Jose Cristobal Guerra | Mission, TX 78572 | $149 |
130 | Romulo Benavides III | Los Ebanos, TX 78565 | $149 |
131 | Ruben Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $149 |
132 | Marcelo Alaniz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $149 |
133 | Alberto A Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $140 |
134 | Rolando Gonzalez | Penitas, TX 78576 | $140 |
135 | Agustin Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $140 |
136 | Jorge E Pena | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $140 |
137 | Renato Chavez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $140 |
138 | Leroy Jackson - Jackson Living Trust | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $140 |
139 | Jorge Luis Zapata | Falcon Heights, TX 78545 | $132 |
140 | Maria Isabel Alaniz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $132 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”