Total Conservation Programs in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 691
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar) totaled $37,501,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Maria L Semelsberger | Suwanee, GA 30024 | $35,928 |
162 | Jose Guadalupe Guerra | San Juan, TX 78589 | $35,389 |
163 | Aurelio Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $34,170 |
164 | Anne M Littlefield | San Antonio, TX 78212 | $34,152 |
165 | John Michael Neal | Santa Rosa Beach, FL 32459 | $33,723 |
166 | Tomas Garcia | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $33,646 |
167 | Jose A Saenz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $33,608 |
168 | Roberto D Garza Jr | Robstown, TX 78380 | $33,496 |
169 | Minerva Longoria | Mission, TX 78572 | $33,477 |
170 | David Saenz | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $33,348 |
171 | Kotzur Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $32,944 |
172 | Silverio H Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $32,350 |
173 | Rancho Reforma LLC | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $30,254 |
174 | Campbell A Patton | Mission, TX 78573 | $30,155 |
175 | Silverio Gabriel Saenz | Mission, TX 78573 | $29,850 |
176 | Proxey K Prukop | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $29,548 |
177 | Juan R Partida | Palmhurst, TX 78573 | $29,532 |
178 | Marshall K Doherty | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $29,388 |
179 | Richard B Haines | Mission, TX 78574 | $29,388 |
180 | Jose Maria Martinez Jr Estate | Mission, TX 78574 | $29,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”