Total Commodity Programs in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 322
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 28th District of Texas (Rep. Henry Cuellar) totaled $1,391,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jaime T Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,437 |
42 | Alberto Martinez | Roma, TX 78584 | $5,400 |
43 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $4,984 |
44 | Eugene S Mackie Family Limited Partnership | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $4,658 |
45 | Jorge E Falcon | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,468 |
46 | Norberto Salinas | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $4,434 |
47 | Darian J Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $4,432 |
48 | Leonel Lopez III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,422 |
49 | Ana Lisa Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,244 |
50 | Jack Dillon Scoggins | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,654 |
51 | Uvaldo Salinas Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,612 |
52 | Fernando D Laurel Jr | Laredo, TX 78045 | $3,570 |
53 | Thalia H Munoz | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,569 |
54 | Edelmiro A Martinez | Laredo, TX 78045 | $3,492 |
55 | , | $3,450 | |
56 | John & Janna Cattle Co | Freer, TX 78357 | $3,439 |
57 | Joe Sid Thomas | Carrizo Springs, TX 78834 | $3,403 |
58 | Jesus M Garza | Laredo, TX 78044 | $3,394 |
59 | Arturo D Ibarra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,389 |
60 | Guerra Cattle Co | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,314 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”