Emergency Conservation Program in 1st District of Utah (Rep. Rob Bishop), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 185
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 1st District of Utah (Rep. Rob Bishop) totaled $770,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Colton Ranch Inc | Bountiful, UT 84010 | $1,691 |
102 | David L Curtis | Paradise, UT 84328 | $1,600 |
103 | Wayne U Godfrey | Clarkston, UT 84305 | $1,590 |
104 | David Barton | Vernal, UT 84078 | $1,548 |
105 | Brett Prevedel | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $1,542 |
106 | Merton Robb | Whiterocks, UT 84085 | $1,512 |
107 | A Kent Olsen | Neola, UT 84053 | $1,491 |
108 | Milton Searle | Vernal, UT 84078 | $1,455 |
109 | Wayne Miles | Mountain Home, UT 84051 | $1,400 |
110 | Terry Hogan | Randlett, UT 84063 | $1,400 |
111 | Roger Griffin | Neola, UT 84053 | $1,388 |
112 | Keith Horrocks | Lapoint, UT 84039 | $1,359 |
113 | Daniel Schaad | Vernal, UT 84078 | $1,332 |
114 | Cody W Jenkins | Vernal, UT 84078 | $1,316 |
115 | Bryan Summers | Hyrum, UT 84319 | $1,266 |
116 | Wilcox Investment Inc | Park City, UT 84060 | $1,264 |
117 | Shane D Mcmullin | Roosevelt, UT 84066 | $1,235 |
118 | James F Allen | Vernal, UT 84078 | $1,203 |
119 | Herbert Steele | Fort Duchesne, UT 84026 | $1,200 |
120 | Howard R Horrocks Family Revocabl | Neola, UT 84053 | $1,163 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”