Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Utah (Rep. Rob Bishop), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 144
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Utah (Rep. Rob Bishop) totaled $1,051,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mervin Thompson | Logan, UT 84341 | $14,986 |
22 | Hardman Properties, Lc | Logan, UT 84323 | $13,328 |
23 | Rabbit Creek Inc | Randolph, UT 84064 | $13,194 |
24 | Casey C Mitchell | Clinton, UT 84015 | $12,540 |
25 | Innovasis Properties LLC | Springville, UT 84663 | $12,010 |
26 | Roger Earley | Laketown, UT 84038 | $11,605 |
27 | Dennie Barson | Hyde Park, UT 84318 | $10,790 |
28 | Glen Benson | Newton, UT 84327 | $9,326 |
29 | Archibald Family Partnership Mar | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $9,209 |
30 | Udell Godfrey | Clarkston, UT 84305 | $8,859 |
31 | Hacking Land & Livestock LLC | Vernal, UT 84078 | $8,360 |
32 | Newel R Thompson Family LLC | Salt Lake City, UT 84116 | $7,977 |
33 | Godfrey Properties L C | Clarkston, UT 84305 | $7,928 |
34 | Lisa L. H. Johnson | Laketown, UT 84038 | $7,595 |
35 | Pearson Family Partnership | Preston, ID 83263 | $7,444 |
36 | West Hills Estates LLC | Mendon, UT 84325 | $7,194 |
37 | Marilynn T Brown | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $6,618 |
38 | George L Thompson | Jackson, WY 83001 | $6,618 |
39 | Thompson Irrevocable Trust-glen W Thompson | Clarkston, UT 84305 | $6,212 |
40 | Ludean Larsen | Logan, UT 84321 | $6,079 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”