Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $264,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | , | $54,347 | |
2 | Valley Lands | Holden, UT 84636 | $34,277 |
3 | W C Hatch Ranch LLC | Scipio, UT 84656 | $28,090 |
4 | Helen B Peterson Family LLC | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $22,703 |
5 | James Dean Larsen | Holden, UT 84636 | $21,693 |
6 | Daniel Ross Stevens | Holden, UT 84636 | $17,427 |
7 | , | $15,571 | |
8 | F Drew Rasmussen | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $13,463 |
9 | Georgia A Starley | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $12,767 |
10 | Don R And Phyllis Dobson Family T | Tooele, UT 84074 | $9,004 |
11 | Sherry Paxton | Kanosh, UT 84637 | $6,888 |
12 | Richard F Wright | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $5,252 |
13 | Janet Monsen | Holden, UT 84636 | $4,648 |
14 | Doyal K Mitchell | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $3,282 |
15 | Colette Mitchell | North Logan, UT 84341 | $3,282 |
16 | Robert Stevens | Holden, UT 84636 | $2,868 |
17 | Matt T Quarnberg | Ogden, UT 84405 | $2,273 |
18 | Midnight Properties Lc | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $1,967 |
19 | Lee Madsen | Kanosh, UT 84637 | $1,720 |
20 | Ross M Stevens | Holden, UT 84636 | $1,475 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>