Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Utah
(Rep. Chris Stewart)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,278
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $26,856,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Arlin S Hughes | Veyo, UT 84782 | $174,515 |
22 | Bar Backward C Group LLC | Salina, UT 84654 | $170,684 |
23 | Clark Brothers | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $168,906 |
24 | Obr Joint Venture | Goshen, UT 84633 | $167,766 |
25 | Sunnyboys Dairy | Delta, UT 84624 | $150,657 |
26 | Calvin/floyd Yardley | Beaver, UT 84713 | $150,433 |
27 | Brb Livestock Co | Sandy, UT 84070 | $149,415 |
28 | Shiloah Communities Inc | Garrison, UT 84728 | $147,214 |
29 | Jim Withers | Delta, UT 84624 | $137,423 |
30 | Plateau Ranches LLC | Kanab, UT 84741 | $136,133 |
31 | Holt Farms LLC | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $131,765 |
32 | Milknm Farms LLC | Washington, UT 84780 | $129,374 |
33 | C & L Farm & Cattle LLC | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $128,887 |
34 | Gardner Dairy | Delta, UT 84624 | $128,138 |
35 | Dutch Cowboy Dairy | Paragonah, UT 84760 | $127,173 |
36 | Crossroads Dairy LLC | Delta, UT 84624 | $126,667 |
37 | Mt Pennell Cattle Company | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $125,907 |
38 | David G Hulet | Summit, UT 84772 | $125,801 |
39 | Duckworth Dairy | Delta, UT 84624 | $125,470 |
40 | Evans Beefmasters Inc | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $122,976 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”