Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Utah
(Rep. Chris Stewart)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 763
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $24,719,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rudger C Atkin Inc | Saint George, UT 84790 | $153,184 |
22 | Heaton Cattle Company LLC | Saint George, UT 84791 | $151,320 |
23 | Roberts Livestock, LLC | Beaver, UT 84713 | $151,064 |
24 | Heaton Livestock Company | Alton, UT 84710 | $150,321 |
25 | Scott A Stubbs | Parowan, UT 84761 | $148,269 |
26 | Bliss Honey LLC | Oak City, UT 84649 | $147,458 |
27 | Johnson Livestock Oak Ranch | Aurora, UT 84620 | $146,975 |
28 | Gubler Ranch LLC | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $141,693 |
29 | Moo Dee Ranch | Marysvale, UT 84750 | $140,375 |
30 | Johnson Mountain Ranch, LLC | Aurora, UT 84620 | $140,239 |
31 | Richard K Nielson | Monroe, UT 84754 | $139,876 |
32 | Titmus Family Farms LLC | Grantsville, UT 84029 | $139,489 |
33 | Michael Yardley Farms LLC | Milford, UT 84751 | $136,584 |
34 | Merlin Esplin | Orderville, UT 84758 | $126,168 |
35 | Evans Beefmasters Inc | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $118,963 |
36 | Daniel Ross Stevens | Holden, UT 84636 | $118,307 |
37 | David G Hulet | Summit, UT 84772 | $118,065 |
38 | C & L Farm & Cattle LLC | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $117,030 |
39 | Gale George | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $116,272 |
40 | Leavitt Land And Investment Inc | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $114,173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”