Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 766

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $16,862,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
1995-2023
21Rudger C Atkin IncSaint George, UT 84790$116,670
22Heaton Cattle Company LLCSaint George, UT 84791$115,174
23Clark BrothersCedar City, UT 84721$111,272
24Stephenson Honey CoDelta, UT 84624$104,855
25Arlin S HughesVeyo, UT 84782$103,571
26Heaton Livestock CompanyAlton, UT 84710$96,070
27Rodney CarterMinersville, UT 84752$95,216
28Moo Dee RanchMarysvale, UT 84750$93,675
29Scorup Cattle Co LLCAurora, UT 84620$93,603
30Roberts Livestock, LLCBeaver, UT 84713$89,494
31Leavitt Land And Investment IncCedar City, UT 84721$87,772
32Ace Land & Livestock LLCFruit Heights, UT 84037$87,663
33Gubler Ranch LLCSanta Clara, UT 84765$81,703
34Double C LivestockAurora, UT 84620$79,057
35Dan E VacherSalem, UT 84653$77,822
36Dc Land & Livestock LcKamas, UT 84036$77,570
37, $77,147
38Michael Yardley Farms LLCMilford, UT 84751$76,223
39Ajax Cattle Company LLCGrantsville, UT 84029$75,913
40Johnson Mountain Ranch, LLCAurora, UT 84620$72,675

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag