Wool and Mohair Programs in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 298
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $1,268,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Carlisle W Hulet | Summit, UT 84772 | $9,964 |
42 | Sherratt Farms | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $9,605 |
43 | Southern Utah University Ag Dept | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $8,941 |
44 | Carl J Dearden | Milford, UT 84751 | $8,882 |
45 | Garth Bagley | Koosharem, UT 84744 | $8,828 |
46 | John Berry | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $8,022 |
47 | Ladon Torgersen | Koosharem, UT 84744 | $7,817 |
48 | David H Jenson | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $7,053 |
49 | Roy Adams Farms Inc | Parowan, UT 84761 | $6,990 |
50 | Calvin L Nelson | Loa, UT 84747 | $6,866 |
51 | Juanita Brinkerhoff | Glendale, UT 84729 | $6,637 |
52 | F Lamont Chappell | Richfield, UT 84701 | $6,573 |
53 | James E Payne | Monroe, UT 84754 | $6,255 |
54 | Glen L Halterman | Parowan, UT 84761 | $6,055 |
55 | Bill E Sorenson | Greenwich, UT 84732 | $5,984 |
56 | Russell W Peterson | Loa, UT 84747 | $5,864 |
57 | Webster & Webster Livestock | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $5,830 |
58 | Maven Bagley | Greenwich, UT 84732 | $5,706 |
59 | Thomas Peterson | Loa, UT 84747 | $5,703 |
60 | Theon Bauer | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $5,238 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”