Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 783
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $3,305,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jones Boys Ranches LLC | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $11,347 |
62 | Greg Greathouse | Lynndyl, UT 84640 | $11,060 |
63 | Bryce Tolbert | Hinckley, UT 84635 | $11,052 |
64 | Bradshaw Livestock LLC | Greenville, UT 84731 | $10,838 |
65 | S & W Hall Co Inc | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $10,794 |
66 | Tim Westwood | Antimony, UT 84712 | $10,424 |
67 | Tavish Edwards | Beaver, UT 84713 | $10,131 |
68 | Danny Yardley | Beaver, UT 84713 | $10,035 |
69 | Wayne A Smith | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $10,007 |
70 | Rees Potter | Mack, CO 81525 | $9,981 |
71 | Y Ranch Company LLC | Beaver, UT 84713 | $9,860 |
72 | Eddie Roberts | Grantsville, UT 84029 | $9,525 |
73 | Wolfhole Cattle LLC | St George, UT 84770 | $9,440 |
74 | Jack King Company LLC | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $9,418 |
75 | Joe Yardley | Beaver, UT 84713 | $9,366 |
76 | Richard M Nelson | Aurora, UT 84620 | $9,245 |
77 | Parker Family Ranch LLC | Ibapah, UT 84034 | $9,197 |
78 | Henry M Bulloch | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $9,185 |
79 | Kasey A King | Antimony, UT 84712 | $8,947 |
80 | Fenton Bowler | Veyo, UT 84782 | $8,921 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”