Lamb Meat Adjustment Program in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 200
Recipients of Lamb Meat Adjustment Program from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $1,351,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Lamb Meat Adjustment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Riley D Taylor | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $3,670 |
62 | Arlo B Larson | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $3,643 |
63 | Philip Taylor | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $3,327 |
64 | Milton Taft | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $3,315 |
65 | Gordon N Johnson | Redmond, UT 84652 | $3,147 |
66 | Thomas D Robinson | Parowan, UT 84761 | $2,982 |
67 | Garth Bagley | Koosharem, UT 84744 | $2,886 |
68 | Chad Brinkerhoff | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $2,859 |
69 | Clark Webster | Las Vegas, NV 89131 | $2,844 |
70 | Boyd Coates | Salina, UT 84654 | $2,713 |
71 | Stanley Brian | Loa, UT 84747 | $2,701 |
72 | Jeffrey Mark Williams | Teasdale, UT 84773 | $2,608 |
73 | Shannon D Brian | Loa, UT 84747 | $2,579 |
74 | Theon Bauer | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $2,400 |
75 | Phil Hirschi | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $2,385 |
76 | John G Pace | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $2,181 |
77 | Merlin Jessop | Colorado City, AZ 86021 | $2,160 |
78 | Glen Deleeuw | Lyman, UT 84749 | $2,053 |
79 | Scott Bagley | Koosharem, UT 84744 | $2,022 |
80 | James M Schlosser | Rush Valley, UT 84069 | $2,010 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”