Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 579
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $4,342,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Paradise Management Inc | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $6,926 |
102 | Bar F Ranch Inc | Minersville, UT 84752 | $6,594 |
103 | Preston Boyd Carter | Delta, UT 84624 | $6,592 |
104 | A Russell Greathouse | Lynndyl, UT 84640 | $6,590 |
105 | Bradshaw Livestock LLC | Greenville, UT 84731 | $6,553 |
106 | Bunker & Sons | Delta, UT 84624 | $6,514 |
107 | L B Ranch | Meadow, UT 84644 | $6,479 |
108 | Whitelaw Inc | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $6,459 |
109 | Dennis Anderson | Delta, UT 84624 | $6,455 |
110 | R & D Farms, LLC | Delta, UT 84624 | $6,453 |
111 | Doyal K Mitchell | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $6,441 |
112 | Travis Kesler | Kanosh, UT 84637 | $6,294 |
113 | Randall K Fowles | Delta, UT 84624 | $6,246 |
114 | Mt Pennell Cattle Company | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $6,245 |
115 | Clark Brothers | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $6,204 |
116 | C & S Jones Livestock Lc | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $6,174 |
117 | Christensen Bros Farms LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $6,131 |
118 | Howlett Farms Inc | Delta, UT 84624 | $5,898 |
119 | Keith Hampton | Redmond, UT 84652 | $5,855 |
120 | Layne Eliason | Delta, UT 84624 | $5,716 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”