Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,761
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $109,473,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Platt Livestock LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $201,337 |
102 | Ross M Stevens | Holden, UT 84636 | $200,217 |
103 | Tony Stanworth | Delta, UT 84624 | $198,330 |
104 | Hampton Farming & Livestock Inc | Redmond, UT 84652 | $194,927 |
105 | Joe Viveiros | Delta, UT 84624 | $193,220 |
106 | Spencer M Butler | Leamington, UT 84638 | $191,485 |
107 | Dick Clark Livestock LLC | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $188,559 |
108 | Horsco Inc | Holden, UT 84636 | $186,476 |
109 | Harold Knight | Delta, UT 84624 | $185,983 |
110 | Mt Pennell Cattle Company | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $185,836 |
111 | Nolan Bastian | Sigurd, UT 84657 | $185,139 |
112 | Marion R Anderson | Oak City, UT 84649 | $184,661 |
113 | Anthony Santos | Delta, UT 84624 | $183,844 |
114 | Dustin Scott Christensen | Richfield, UT 84701 | $183,797 |
115 | Esplin Livestock LLC | Mount Carmel, UT 84755 | $180,344 |
116 | Douglas Spring Run Farms Inc | Tooele, UT 84074 | $180,287 |
117 | Gregory Smith | Delta, UT 84624 | $178,683 |
118 | Don Knight | Delta, UT 84624 | $178,341 |
119 | Glade Stevens | Holden, UT 84636 | $177,224 |
120 | Brent F Hunter | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $176,693 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”