Production Flexibility Program in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 858
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $7,911,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Probert Brothers | Scipio, UT 84656 | $17,202 |
122 | Bradshaw Farms & Equipment Inc | Beaver, UT 84713 | $17,105 |
123 | Bruce Turner | Delta, UT 84624 | $17,045 |
124 | Grayson Roper Limited Partnership | Oak City, UT 84649 | $17,023 |
125 | Kirt M Bussio | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $16,857 |
126 | Paul W Fowles | Delta, UT 84624 | $16,807 |
127 | Ronald H Weber | Salt Lake City, UT 84105 | $16,587 |
128 | Michael D Yardley | Milford, UT 84751 | $16,572 |
129 | Lorraine Whitaker | Kanosh, UT 84637 | $16,462 |
130 | Roberts Bros %don Roberts | Beaver, UT 84713 | $16,430 |
131 | Rick G Porter | Richfield, UT 84701 | $16,406 |
132 | William Dalton | Minersville, UT 84752 | $16,374 |
133 | Andrew Dahlsrud | Salina, UT 84654 | $16,306 |
134 | Lamar Anderson | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $16,288 |
135 | Chad H Anderson | Richfield, UT 84701 | $16,040 |
136 | Hotowen Inc | West Valley City, UT 84128 | $16,025 |
137 | Warren Jensen | Delta, UT 84624 | $15,658 |
138 | David H Dastrup | Monroe, UT 84754 | $15,641 |
139 | Stevens Dairy | Holden, UT 84636 | $15,306 |
140 | Greg Greathouse | Lynndyl, UT 84640 | $15,301 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”