Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 324

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $5,327,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
121Stan MechamTropic, UT 84776$14,645
122Joe DaltonCircleville, UT 84723$14,248
123G Richard JonesSevier, UT 84766$14,000
124Mark RobinsScipio, UT 84656$13,768
125John D JacksonTorrey, UT 84775$13,620
126H Dell LefevreBoulder, UT 84716$13,457
127Philip R GiesingPoway, CA 92074$13,341
128Lonne GublerSanta Clara, UT 84765$13,164
129Randy RamsleyTorrey, UT 84775$13,125
130Lavar SagersRush Valley, UT 84069$13,102
131Barry MonroeScipio, UT 84656$13,045
132Karl Don TaylorBicknell, UT 84715$13,012
133Grayson Roper Limited PartnershipOak City, UT 84649$12,525
134Thomas C MemmottScipio, UT 84656$12,160
135Robins Ranch, Inc.Salt Lake City, UT 84117$12,095
136J Allen LevieSevier, UT 84766$12,068
137Chad TorgersonKoosharem, UT 84744$12,052
138Tracy W HenrieCedar City, UT 84721$11,833
139Juliann HenriePanguitch, UT 84759$11,833
140Melvin BrooksEscalante, UT 84726$11,555

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag