Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 324
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $5,327,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Stan Mecham | Tropic, UT 84776 | $14,645 |
122 | Joe Dalton | Circleville, UT 84723 | $14,248 |
123 | G Richard Jones | Sevier, UT 84766 | $14,000 |
124 | Mark Robins | Scipio, UT 84656 | $13,768 |
125 | John D Jackson | Torrey, UT 84775 | $13,620 |
126 | H Dell Lefevre | Boulder, UT 84716 | $13,457 |
127 | Philip R Giesing | Poway, CA 92074 | $13,341 |
128 | Lonne Gubler | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $13,164 |
129 | Randy Ramsley | Torrey, UT 84775 | $13,125 |
130 | Lavar Sagers | Rush Valley, UT 84069 | $13,102 |
131 | Barry Monroe | Scipio, UT 84656 | $13,045 |
132 | Karl Don Taylor | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $13,012 |
133 | Grayson Roper Limited Partnership | Oak City, UT 84649 | $12,525 |
134 | Thomas C Memmott | Scipio, UT 84656 | $12,160 |
135 | Robins Ranch, Inc. | Salt Lake City, UT 84117 | $12,095 |
136 | J Allen Levie | Sevier, UT 84766 | $12,068 |
137 | Chad Torgerson | Koosharem, UT 84744 | $12,052 |
138 | Tracy W Henrie | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $11,833 |
139 | Juliann Henrie | Panguitch, UT 84759 | $11,833 |
140 | Melvin Brooks | Escalante, UT 84726 | $11,555 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”