Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 372
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $1,538,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cow Hollow Grazing Association In | Rush Valley, UT 84069 | $47,450 |
2 | Delta Westside Dairy | Beryl, UT 84714 | $40,500 |
3 | Don R Probert | Scipio, UT 84656 | $33,014 |
4 | Morgan Ranches LLC | Circleville, UT 84723 | $31,500 |
5 | Ivan L Robins | Scipio, UT 84656 | $30,150 |
6 | Deven Gass | Circleville, UT 84723 | $27,718 |
7 | Theron Mills & Son Inc | Joseph, UT 84739 | $25,475 |
8 | Chris Fullmer | Sigurd, UT 84657 | $21,000 |
9 | Doyle Pace Trust | Delta, UT 84624 | $20,000 |
10 | Glen Michael Snyder | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $20,000 |
11 | Dennis Stefanoff | Delta, UT 84624 | $20,000 |
12 | Cannon Livestock Co Inc | Circleville, UT 84723 | $17,500 |
13 | Lynn Barnson | Circleville, UT 84723 | $17,500 |
14 | Monroe Brothers | Scipio, UT 84656 | $17,289 |
15 | Goshute Indian Reservation | Ibapah, UT 84034 | $16,283 |
16 | L And W Ranch %lyle Wiseman | Milford, UT 84751 | $15,225 |
17 | Kasey A King | Antimony, UT 84712 | $14,946 |
18 | Ramon G Prestwich | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $14,800 |
19 | Carlos Robinson | Parowan, UT 84761 | $13,808 |
20 | Robins Ranch, Inc. | Salt Lake City, UT 84117 | $13,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>