Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 406
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $3,777,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | L&w Ranch Inc %scott Wiseman | Milford, UT 84751 | $38,398 |
22 | Michael Jacob Christensen | Delta, UT 84624 | $35,776 |
23 | Shawn Reber Farms LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $33,935 |
24 | Roger E Stanworth | Delta, UT 84624 | $32,384 |
25 | Etm Farms Inc | Minersville, UT 84752 | $31,611 |
26 | Matthew Stanworth | Oasis, UT 84624 | $30,616 |
27 | Christensen Bros Farms LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $30,401 |
28 | Dustin Scott Christensen | Richfield, UT 84701 | $30,324 |
29 | James Walker | Delta, UT 84624 | $30,186 |
30 | Daniel Johnson | Delta, UT 84624 | $30,158 |
31 | Ladd Hales | Delta, UT 84624 | $29,629 |
32 | Chad R Peterson | Delta, UT 84624 | $29,436 |
33 | Paradise Management Inc | Fillmore, UT 84631 | $27,851 |
34 | Theron Mills & Son Inc | Joseph, UT 84739 | $27,813 |
35 | Reed Carter | Beaver, UT 84713 | $26,691 |
36 | A Russell Greathouse | Lynndyl, UT 84640 | $26,569 |
37 | Dallas J Anderson | Delta, UT 84624 | $25,535 |
38 | Andrew Dahlsrud | Salina, UT 84654 | $24,258 |
39 | Leo E England | Delta, UT 84624 | $24,187 |
40 | J Kelly Evans | Parowan, UT 84761 | $23,493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”