Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,550
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $15,543,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vance J Finlinson | Oak City, UT 84649 | $76,731 |
22 | Jeffery Ranches | Fremont, UT 84747 | $75,985 |
23 | Berkley Anderson | Glenwood, UT 84730 | $74,908 |
24 | Fenton Bowler | Veyo, UT 84782 | $73,225 |
25 | Phil Allen | Antimony, UT 84712 | $71,777 |
26 | Wayne G Phillips | Escalante, UT 84726 | $70,886 |
27 | Esplin Livestock LLC | Mount Carmel, UT 84755 | $69,616 |
28 | Duckworth Dairy | Delta, UT 84624 | $69,244 |
29 | Clark & Shirley Bradshaw Family L | Beaver, UT 84713 | $69,034 |
30 | Henry M Bulloch | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $68,671 |
31 | Morgan Ranches LLC | Circleville, UT 84723 | $67,646 |
32 | Chris Fullmer | Sigurd, UT 84657 | $66,318 |
33 | Stanton J Gleave | Kingston, UT 84743 | $64,097 |
34 | Thomas Gardner | Ely, NV 89301 | $63,794 |
35 | Bradley K Guymon | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $63,683 |
36 | Howard W Jones | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $62,023 |
37 | Franklin James O'driscoll | Gunnison, UT 84634 | $60,104 |
38 | Denice J Hughes | Saint George, UT 84790 | $59,705 |
39 | Merrill Yardley | Beaver, UT 84713 | $59,423 |
40 | Andrew G Taft | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $58,494 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”