Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 326
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis) totaled $2,054,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kenneth E Bates | Moab, UT 84532 | $23,653 |
22 | , | $23,575 | |
23 | Ty Cattle Company | Blanding, UT 84511 | $23,463 |
24 | Dustin D Huntington | Castle Dale, UT 84513 | $23,394 |
25 | William Marsing Livestock Inc | Price, UT 84501 | $22,696 |
26 | Florence Family Farm LLC | Milford, UT 84751 | $22,465 |
27 | Kash D Winn | Ferron, UT 84523 | $20,786 |
28 | The Nature Conservancy | Minneapolis, MN 55415 | $20,569 |
29 | Robinson & Sons LLC | Monticello, UT 84535 | $20,441 |
30 | Justus L Jorgensen | Castle Dale, UT 84513 | $19,642 |
31 | Ross Clay Wilberg | Castle Dale, UT 84513 | $19,259 |
32 | Jesus Oscar Alvarez | Monticello, UT 84535 | $19,100 |
33 | Taylor Livestock Corp | Moab, UT 84532 | $18,056 |
34 | Lyman Livestock LLC | Salem, UT 84653 | $17,708 |
35 | Steve Stamatakis | Price, UT 84501 | $17,418 |
36 | Charlotte Johnson | Monticello, UT 84535 | $17,275 |
37 | Black Dragon Ranch LLC | Ferron, UT 84523 | $17,179 |
38 | Cameron Jensen | Elmo, UT 84521 | $16,586 |
39 | Coby D Hunt | Green River, UT 84525 | $14,997 |
40 | Bill Stansfield | Emery, UT 84522 | $14,743 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”