Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 105
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis) totaled $413,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dorothy Phillips | Aneth, UT 84510 | $678 |
82 | Cynthia Madison | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $673 |
83 | Clayton Palmer | Blanding, UT 84511 | $597 |
84 | Ld Jensen | Cleveland, UT 84518 | $593 |
85 | Clifton R Mcelprang | Huntington, UT 84528 | $593 |
86 | Rosalie Clitso | Kayenta, AZ 86033 | $577 |
87 | Marie Bigman | Teec Nos Pos, AZ 86514 | $572 |
88 | Rose Marie Johnson | Tonalea, AZ 86044 | $564 |
89 | Linda Heman | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $555 |
90 | James F Benally | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $553 |
91 | Chris L Carter | Cleveland, UT 84518 | $534 |
92 | David Neal Hansen | Elmo, UT 84521 | $507 |
93 | Russell Odle | Emery, UT 84522 | $501 |
94 | Gary Price | Clawson, UT 84516 | $373 |
95 | Lucretia Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $373 |
96 | Marilyn S Benally | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $370 |
97 | Tony Tallis | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $339 |
98 | William Marsing Livestock Inc | Price, UT 84501 | $315 |
99 | Samuel Dee | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $315 |
100 | Ken Christiansen | Emery, UT 84522 | $231 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”