Non-insured Disaster Assistance in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 162
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis) totaled $550,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Elouise Wilson | Mexican Hat, UT 84531 | $405 |
102 | Harve Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $405 |
103 | Betty Jones | White Mesa, UT 84511 | $405 |
104 | Joyce Fatt | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $399 |
105 | Jimmy Y Whitehorse | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $390 |
106 | Alexander Bitsinnie | Tonalea, AZ 86044 | $390 |
107 | Jean Marie Holgate | Tonalea, AZ 86044 | $390 |
108 | Stewart Farley | Teec Nos Pos, AZ 86514 | $390 |
109 | Cynthia Madison | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $382 |
110 | Irene Pelt | Tonalea, AZ 86044 | $382 |
111 | Esther Begaye | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $367 |
112 | Gregory Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $367 |
113 | Lorraine Stanley | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $367 |
114 | Angelo G Pappas | Wellington, UT 84542 | $355 |
115 | Sylvia S Clark | Tonalea, AZ 86044 | $343 |
116 | Victoria Joe | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $336 |
117 | Edward A Begay | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $327 |
118 | Regina Stash Begaye | Bluff, UT 84512 | $327 |
119 | Ross Holiday | Monument Valley, UT 84536 | $320 |
120 | Marilyn Holly | Montezuma Creek, UT 84534 | $320 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”