Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 101

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $542,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
2021
41Robert E WaringTappahannock, VA 22560$2,921
42Robert M MitchellDunnsville, VA 22454$2,587
43Tate And Tate IncColonial Beach, VA 22443$2,430
44J C Owens JrKing George, VA 22485$2,428
45Deere Haven Farms IncShacklefords, VA 23156$2,420
46Benjamin B Ellis JrChamplain, VA 22438$2,384
47Richard M Schools JrSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$2,256
48Tony B ReynoldsKilmarnock, VA 22482$2,233
49John R HaileTappahannock, VA 22560$2,197
50John Cleveland OwensKing George, VA 22485$2,148
51Daniel A DeweyCaret, VA 22436$2,076
52J & D Carlton Farms IncMattaponi, VA 23110$2,060
53Kermit P Thomas JrPort Royal, VA 22535$2,011
54Carlton & Calhoun Farms IncMascot, VA 23108$1,997
55Herbert Dale WilliamsKing George, VA 22485$1,984
56Donald Ray BarefordTappahannock, VA 22560$1,977
57Poplar Grove Lawn Maintenance & Landscaping IncSaluda, VA 23149$1,897
58Old Mill Farm IncTappahannock, VA 22560$1,862
59C Gene SwannHeathsville, VA 22473$1,845
60Robert P LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$1,811

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag