Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 220
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $44,685 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $129 |
62 | Ronnie Russell | Water View, VA 23180 | $123 |
63 | Midway Farms Inc | Caret, VA 22436 | $119 |
64 | Harris Farms Inc | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $104 |
65 | Daniel E Tignor | Caret, VA 22436 | $101 |
66 | B L Battaile And Sons Inc | Montross, VA 22520 | $101 |
67 | Robert Collawn | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $100 |
68 | Mark W Miller | Center Cross, VA 22437 | $99 |
69 | R Rodger Andrews | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $99 |
70 | Daniel G Tignor | Caret, VA 22436 | $95 |
71 | James L Allen Jr | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $93 |
72 | Kevin J Bareford | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $93 |
73 | Virginia P Sasser | Fredericksburg, VA 22401 | $92 |
74 | S B Baird Jr | Caret, VA 22436 | $90 |
75 | Hillsborough Farm Inc | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $78 |
76 | Brandon Farms | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $76 |
77 | Tate And Tate Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $70 |
78 | Frank O Brooks Jr | King William, VA 23086 | $69 |
79 | Nathan P Ball | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $68 |
80 | Old Mill Farm Inc | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $68 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”