Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 438

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $16,101,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
81Tate And Tate IncColonial Beach, VA 22443$60,925
82James O BlakeGloucester, VA 23061$60,920
83John B Minor JrTappahannock, VA 22560$60,402
84Deere Haven Farms IncShacklefords, VA 23156$60,342
85Beaver Dam Farm IncLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$60,246
86Pointer Bros IncGloucester, VA 23061$59,082
87Benjamin B Ellis JrChamplain, VA 22438$58,202
88William S HarwoodGloucester, VA 23061$57,084
89William Davis CarltonLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$55,840
90Holyoke Farms IncLancaster, VA 22503$55,684
91Charles M SwannHeathsville, VA 22473$55,491
92Evans LewisWarsaw, VA 22572$55,120
93Richard H LeighGloucester, VA 23061$54,147
94Louis Fairfax ChandlerMontross, VA 22520$53,502
95Robert E WaringTappahannock, VA 22560$49,464
96Craig Huling GieseLancaster, VA 22503$49,418
97Robert P LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$48,456
98Baird Farms LLCChamplain, VA 22438$47,997
99Centerview Farms IncLancaster, VA 22503$47,762
100Carl Lee TateHague, VA 22469$47,073

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag