Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 112
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $137,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James Alexander Hinton | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $1,898 |
22 | John G King | King George, VA 22485 | $1,721 |
23 | Antoinette D Beane | Lancaster, VA 22503 | $1,613 |
24 | Anna Clarke Sas | Virginia Beach, VA 23452 | $1,588 |
25 | David Evans | Lancaster, VA 22503 | $1,549 |
26 | Gregory H Ray | Ashland, VA 23005 | $1,451 |
27 | Garnett L Harris | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $1,362 |
28 | Edna D Davis | Caret, VA 22436 | $1,361 |
29 | Phillip Joseph Rollins | King George, VA 22485 | $1,297 |
30 | James Channon | Hustle, VA 22476 | $1,277 |
31 | Beverly K Bryce | Burke, VA 22015 | $1,215 |
32 | Robert E Gibson Credit Shelter Trust | King And Queen Court, VA 23085 | $1,168 |
33 | Ricky H Fogg | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $1,140 |
34 | Zelma L Paschal | Atlanta, GA 30331 | $1,043 |
35 | F Glenwood Howland | King George, VA 22485 | $1,038 |
36 | Joseph E Major Jr | Center Cross, VA 22437 | $1,038 |
37 | Archie C Crowe Jr | Providence Forge, VA 23140 | $1,022 |
38 | Charles E Crowe | Providence Forge, VA 23140 | $1,022 |
39 | Janet R B Davenport | Lancaster, VA 22503 | $989 |
40 | David C Burton | Montross, VA 22520 | $973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”