Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Virginia
(Rep. Donald McEachin)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 96
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin) totaled $317,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | G Henry Goodrich | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $6,100 |
22 | Old Hickory Farms Inc | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $5,975 |
23 | Lewis Farms, LLC | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $5,507 |
24 | Ryland C Fox Jr | Emporia, VA 23847 | $5,290 |
25 | Oak View Farms Partnership | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $5,163 |
26 | Robert Moyler Pond Jr | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $5,159 |
27 | Passenger Run Farms LLC | Elberon, VA 23846 | $5,117 |
28 | Jerry L Rogers | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $4,932 |
29 | Thomas M Westheimer | Ivor, VA 23866 | $4,673 |
30 | Shanko Farm LLC | Yale, VA 23897 | $4,510 |
31 | William S Poarch | Jarratt, VA 23867 | $3,749 |
32 | Pierce Farms LLC | Surry, VA 23883 | $3,680 |
33 | Mary Lilley Conover | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $3,311 |
34 | Giron Wooden | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $3,183 |
35 | Peggie E Owen | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $3,167 |
36 | Laurance Richard Matthews | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $2,907 |
37 | L Randy Everett | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $2,269 |
38 | Phyllis T Harrup | Yale, VA 23897 | $2,134 |
39 | Jay A Padgett | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $1,884 |
40 | A P Lilley LLC | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $1,848 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”