Emergency Conservation Program in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 91
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin) totaled $270,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Robert Hall Spiers Jr | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $1,102 |
62 | Calvin W Clements | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $1,084 |
63 | Jay A Padgett | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $1,058 |
64 | Harriet C Mayes | Jarratt, VA 23867 | $1,032 |
65 | Gilbert J Harrup | Yale, VA 23897 | $957 |
66 | Steven Pittman | Elberon, VA 23846 | $945 |
67 | Donald Wade Little | Ivor, VA 23866 | $900 |
68 | Edmond R Curley | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $854 |
69 | E Keith Seward | Elberon, VA 23846 | $849 |
70 | John M Zimmerman Iv | Yale, VA 23897 | $797 |
71 | G C Holloway Jr | Jarratt, VA 23867 | $750 |
72 | Barry Ray Collier | Williamsburg, VA 23185 | $720 |
73 | Paul W Rogers III | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $661 |
74 | Percy E Byrum Jr | Carson, VA 23830 | $615 |
75 | George Shanko Jr | Yale, VA 23897 | $600 |
76 | Theron Henry Blount | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $557 |
77 | Almeda S Lanier | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $550 |
78 | Batten Farms | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $540 |
79 | Glover W Pegram Survivors Trust Utd Jan 20 1997 | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $529 |
80 | W Brian Pittman | Elberon, VA 23846 | $495 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”