Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Virginia
(Rep. Donald McEachin)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 184
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin) totaled $2,361,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Richard B Scott | Waverly, VA 23890 | $6,879 |
62 | Elwood B Wooden Jr | Waverly, VA 23890 | $6,868 |
63 | Jordan W Cox | Yale, VA 23897 | $6,311 |
64 | Crutchfield Farms LLC | Prince George, VA 23875 | $5,967 |
65 | Michael W Epps | Surry, VA 23883 | $5,966 |
66 | , | $5,833 | |
67 | , | $5,750 | |
68 | South Bend Farms LLC | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $5,698 |
69 | Ronald W Nicholson | Waverly, VA 23890 | $5,675 |
70 | Giron Wooden | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $5,574 |
71 | Ryland C Fox Jr | Emporia, VA 23847 | $5,254 |
72 | Joseph H Wooden Jr | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $4,931 |
73 | Sidney R Robinson | Emporia, VA 23847 | $4,654 |
74 | Shanko Farm LLC | Yale, VA 23897 | $4,510 |
75 | Mark E Wheeler | Waverly, VA 23890 | $4,464 |
76 | Mary Lilley Conover | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $4,355 |
77 | Donald C Dickerson | Yale, VA 23897 | $4,243 |
78 | Laurance Richard Matthews | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $4,218 |
79 | Roger Bishop Collier | Waverly, VA 23890 | $3,489 |
80 | S & J Farms LLC | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $3,481 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”