Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 125
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin) totaled $3,384,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Marvin Stephenson Jr | Waverly, VA 23890 | $1,812 |
102 | George M Gornto Jr | Norfolk, VA 23518 | $1,664 |
103 | Joe Gray | Waverly, VA 23890 | $1,595 |
104 | William L Gilchrist | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $1,328 |
105 | Bowling Green Farms, LLC | Waverly, VA 23890 | $1,320 |
106 | Slade Naturals | Surry, VA 23883 | $1,158 |
107 | Matthew David Washam | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $1,155 |
108 | Robert G Gornto | Waverly, VA 23890 | $1,155 |
109 | Benton James | Elberon, VA 23846 | $1,100 |
110 | Jonathan B Seward | Elberon, VA 23846 | $1,100 |
111 | Byron Bishop | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $977 |
112 | John T Leonard | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $899 |
113 | Harrup Family Limited Partnership | Yale, VA 23897 | $880 |
114 | David A Ware | Charles City, VA 23030 | $880 |
115 | Raymond Warren | Waverly, VA 23890 | $770 |
116 | , | $744 | |
117 | Amy N Howell | Ivor, VA 23866 | $660 |
118 | Rachel D Pittman | Elberon, VA 23846 | $619 |
119 | June Chambers Noblitt | Waverly, VA 23890 | $569 |
120 | Anthony Seward | Elberon, VA 23846 | $506 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”