Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Virginia
(Rep. Donald McEachin)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 230
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin) totaled $4,733,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Aldon A Turner | Virginia Beach, VA 23462 | $1,312 |
142 | Ted Upton Jr | Waverly, VA 23890 | $1,277 |
143 | The 1992 Steven Hall Trust | Yale, VA 23897 | $1,272 |
144 | Robert E Carroll Jr | Ebony, VA 23845 | $1,213 |
145 | Michael Carroll | Bracey, VA 23919 | $1,213 |
146 | Michael H Drewry | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $1,199 |
147 | Marvin Stephenson Jr | Waverly, VA 23890 | $1,165 |
148 | Charles H Owen | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $1,146 |
149 | Dobie Prince Project LLC | Oriental, NC 28571 | $1,122 |
150 | Four Alarm Farm, LLC | Surry, VA 23883 | $1,116 |
151 | David Keith Harrell Jr | Emporia, VA 23847 | $1,057 |
152 | Matthew David Washam | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $1,054 |
153 | W Brian Pittman | Surry, VA 23883 | $1,032 |
154 | Slade Naturals | Surry, VA 23883 | $1,007 |
155 | John T Leonard | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $1,002 |
156 | Surry Land & Development LLC | Dendron, VA 23839 | $984 |
157 | Robert D Richards Jr | Elberon, VA 23846 | $956 |
158 | Thomas Junius Cox | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $896 |
159 | Joe Gray | Waverly, VA 23890 | $862 |
160 | Bowling Green Farms, LLC | Waverly, VA 23890 | $855 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”