Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Virginia
(Rep. Donald McEachin)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 230
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin) totaled $4,733,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Joan G Daniel | Chester, VA 23831 | $841 |
162 | Glover W Pegram Survivors Trust Utd Jan 20 1997 | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $803 |
163 | Rebecca Anne Lilley | Carson, VA 23830 | $768 |
164 | Benton James | Elberon, VA 23846 | $752 |
165 | George M Gornto Jr | Norfolk, VA 23518 | $733 |
166 | Cynthia Ann Jones | Waverly, VA 23890 | $718 |
167 | Byron Bishop | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $710 |
168 | Armand Wyatt | Waverly, VA 23890 | $650 |
169 | Connie Young | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $635 |
170 | William L Gilchrist | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $614 |
171 | Matthew A Brantley | Sedley, VA 23878 | $606 |
172 | Alice Presson Higgins | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $594 |
173 | Scott W Liebold | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $587 |
174 | Wayne John Orton Jr | North Dinwiddie, VA 23805 | $582 |
175 | Walter S Lanier Jr | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $531 |
176 | Jonathan B Seward | Elberon, VA 23846 | $527 |
177 | Lee S Flanders | Elberon, VA 23846 | $519 |
178 | Raymond Warren | Waverly, VA 23890 | $494 |
179 | James J Shanko III | Yale, VA 23897 | $470 |
180 | Steven B Jones | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $441 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”