Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 98
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 4th District of Virginia (Rep. Donald McEachin) totaled $1,163,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | A&r Farm, LLC | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $18,229 |
22 | Rideout Farms LLC | Jarratt, VA 23867 | $17,597 |
23 | Itata Farms LLC | Elberon, VA 23846 | $16,829 |
24 | Nottoway Farms | Waverly, VA 23890 | $16,814 |
25 | Gum Corner Farm LLC | Elberon, VA 23846 | $15,882 |
26 | Arthur Gray Garter Jr | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $15,547 |
27 | W Brian Pittman | Elberon, VA 23846 | $14,328 |
28 | Jay A Padgett | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $13,893 |
29 | Oak View Farms Partnership | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $13,877 |
30 | Geneva Letitia Padgett | Claremont, VA 23899 | $13,549 |
31 | Robert E Nay Dvm | South Prince George, VA 23805 | $13,368 |
32 | Cox Farms | Elberon, VA 23846 | $12,285 |
33 | Clarke Farms LLC | Stony Creek, VA 23882 | $11,978 |
34 | Steven Hunter Savedge | Elberon, VA 23846 | $11,874 |
35 | Jared L Webb | Yale, VA 23897 | $11,688 |
36 | G Henry Goodrich | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $10,937 |
37 | Keith Dunn | Yale, VA 23897 | $10,773 |
38 | H M Dunn, Jr. | Yale, VA 23897 | $10,773 |
39 | Pierce Farms LLC | Surry, VA 23883 | $10,517 |
40 | Donald Claude Whitmore Jr | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $10,187 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”