Total Conservation Programs in 5th District of Virginia (Rep. Denver Riggleman), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 220
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 5th District of Virginia (Rep. Denver Riggleman) totaled $221,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John F Bosiger Jr | Halifax, VA 24558 | $1,227 |
42 | Edith B Adams | Alton, VA 24520 | $1,214 |
43 | David Glenn Ferguson | Nathalie, VA 24577 | $1,202 |
44 | Ward Burton | Halifax, VA 24558 | $1,196 |
45 | James S Pugh II | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $1,175 |
46 | James Scott Pugh | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $1,175 |
47 | James M Martin | Altavista, VA 24517 | $1,131 |
48 | Sanford V Wiles Jr | Ringgold, VA 24586 | $1,127 |
49 | Woodrow S Wilson III | Amherst, VA 24521 | $1,106 |
50 | J C Satterfield Jr | Halifax, VA 24558 | $1,096 |
51 | Patricia F Wilmouth | Halifax, VA 24558 | $1,095 |
52 | Johnny K Long | Kenbridge, VA 23944 | $1,073 |
53 | Catherine J Garnett | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $1,071 |
54 | James Ray Wood | Danville, VA 24540 | $1,037 |
55 | Gerald C Burnett | South Boston, VA 24592 | $1,022 |
56 | Logan Thomas Mills | Callands, VA 24530 | $997 |
57 | Joanne W Andrews | Chase City, VA 23924 | $962 |
58 | Earl N Atkins | Victoria, VA 23974 | $953 |
59 | Edwin Atkinson Chaney III | South Boston, VA 24592 | $925 |
60 | E Glenn Watson | Sutherlin, VA 24594 | $917 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”