Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 5th District of Virginia (Rep. Denver Riggleman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 257
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 5th District of Virginia (Rep. Denver Riggleman) totaled $5,674,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Evelyn L Hines | Nathalie, VA 24577 | $9,109 |
102 | Danny G Puckett | Scottsburg, VA 24589 | $8,905 |
103 | Tonchie Y Mason Jr | Nathalie, VA 24577 | $8,895 |
104 | Glenn P Nunn | Virgilina, VA 24598 | $8,496 |
105 | Edward M Moon Jr | Long Island, VA 24569 | $8,364 |
106 | Ronald J Lenhart | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $8,065 |
107 | Wagstaff Dairy | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $8,058 |
108 | Clowdis Brothers LLC | Saxe, VA 23967 | $7,847 |
109 | Wylie Hamilton Farrar Jr | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $7,844 |
110 | Joe Motley | Gretna, VA 24557 | $7,763 |
111 | William T Arrington III | Virgilina, VA 24598 | $7,706 |
112 | Canada Knoll | Phenix, VA 23959 | $7,586 |
113 | Patricia Rowland | Gretna, VA 24557 | $7,395 |
114 | Joseph Kevin Motley | Gretna, VA 24557 | $7,168 |
115 | Samuel M Giles | Chatham, VA 24531 | $7,148 |
116 | William Jerry Francis | Saxe, VA 23967 | $7,035 |
117 | James Easley Edmunds II | Halifax, VA 24558 | $7,005 |
118 | Caleb Thomas Burnette | Danville, VA 24540 | $6,957 |
119 | Martin Turner Smith | South Hill, VA 23970 | $6,822 |
120 | Don L Anderson | Crystal Hill, VA 24539 | $6,812 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”