Production Flexibility Program in 5th District of Virginia (Rep. Denver Riggleman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 3,879
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 5th District of Virginia (Rep. Denver Riggleman) totaled $8,875,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Samuel N Geesaman | Cullen, VA 23934 | $12,284 |
142 | Rosemary Farm | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $12,130 |
143 | Alan W Hudson | Virgilina, VA 24598 | $12,075 |
144 | Danny A Walker | Callands, VA 24530 | $12,074 |
145 | Jerry Wayne Moser | Java, VA 24565 | $12,010 |
146 | Thomas L Keatts | Danville, VA 24541 | $11,910 |
147 | Arcadia Farm | Charlotte Court Hous, VA 23923 | $11,826 |
148 | Keith Atkinson | Java, VA 24565 | $11,821 |
149 | Verne D Anderson | Roanoke, VA 24018 | $11,805 |
150 | Aubrey D Lowery | Virgilina, VA 24598 | $11,757 |
151 | John Amos | Callands, VA 24530 | $11,735 |
152 | Joe Watts Jr | Scottsburg, VA 24589 | $11,504 |
153 | Johnny K Long | Kenbridge, VA 23944 | $11,475 |
154 | Wendell Myrl Crowder Jr | South Hill, VA 23970 | $11,475 |
155 | Powell Powell And Thompson | Sutherlin, VA 24594 | $11,470 |
156 | Samuel C Terry III | Keeling, VA 24566 | $11,408 |
157 | Jesse E Owen | Chatham, VA 24531 | $11,341 |
158 | Manning Farms Inc | South Hill, VA 23970 | $11,313 |
159 | Ramsey Farms | Clarksville, VA 23927 | $11,292 |
160 | Circle W Farm Inc | South Hill, VA 23970 | $11,254 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”