Farm Subsidy information
6th District of Virginia
(Rep. Ben Cline)
Total Subsidies in 6th District of Virginia (Rep. Ben Cline), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 107
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 6th District of Virginia (Rep. Ben Cline) totaled $628,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ingleside Dairy Farm, Incorporated | Lexington, VA 24450 | $152,542 |
2 | Mcclungs LLC | Fairfield, VA 24435 | $130,516 |
3 | Rock Bottom Dairy LLC | Rockbridge Baths, VA 24473 | $99,965 |
4 | Mountain View Farm Products LLC | Fairfield, VA 24435 | $41,845 |
5 | Kari Botkin Sponaugle | Doe Hill, VA 24433 | $40,629 |
6 | , | $29,911 | |
7 | Triple J Farm Inc | Rockbridge Baths, VA 24473 | $15,851 |
8 | Huffman Livestock, LLC | Lexington, VA 24450 | $11,875 |
9 | J2 Farms LLC | Fairfield, VA 24435 | $11,771 |
10 | Glen Valley Farms LLC | Covington, VA 24426 | $5,020 |
11 | Raymond E Bowkley | Blue Grass, VA 24413 | $4,707 |
12 | Mountain View Florists Inc | Rockbridge Baths, VA 24473 | $4,319 |
13 | J-j Cattle LLC | Fairfield, VA 24435 | $3,709 |
14 | Mary E Depoy | Dayton, VA 22821 | $3,603 |
15 | Tamarack Of Highland LLC | Harrisonburg, VA 22802 | $3,586 |
16 | Charles Asbury Potter III | Lexington, VA 24450 | $3,291 |
17 | Susan Smith Showalter | Fairfield, VA 24435 | $3,005 |
18 | , | $2,696 | |
19 | Mulberry Grove Farm Limited Partn | Raphine, VA 24472 | $2,253 |
20 | Drifting Lane/ Peggy Jennings | Staunton, VA 24401 | $2,117 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>