Total Commodity Programs in 6th District of Virginia (Rep. Ben Cline), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 351
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 6th District of Virginia (Rep. Ben Cline) totaled $5,360,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charles Asbury Potter III | Lexington, VA 24450 | $43,118 |
22 | Hays Creek Enterprises | Raphine, VA 24472 | $42,414 |
23 | Holland's General Contractors Inc | Lexington, VA 24450 | $42,128 |
24 | Cole S Armstrong | Williamsville, VA 24487 | $42,015 |
25 | H Timothy Swartz | Natural Bridge, VA 24578 | $39,510 |
26 | Short Hill Farm Inc | Lexington, VA 24450 | $36,379 |
27 | Csf Cattle Co | Raphine, VA 24472 | $35,996 |
28 | Ernest Lightner | Monterey, VA 24465 | $34,155 |
29 | Mark Waybright | Monterey, VA 24465 | $32,794 |
30 | Kari Botkin Sponaugle | Doe Hill, VA 24433 | $32,267 |
31 | Richard Taylor Clements II | Fairfield, VA 24435 | $32,257 |
32 | Jonathan Repair | Glasgow, VA 24555 | $30,709 |
33 | Robert Lambert Jr | Monterey, VA 24465 | $30,624 |
34 | Richard D Grant | Raphine, VA 24472 | $29,817 |
35 | Mountain View Florists Inc | Rockbridge Baths, VA 24473 | $28,790 |
36 | Rodney P Leech | Monterey, VA 24465 | $27,254 |
37 | Jackie W Will | Blue Grass, VA 24413 | $26,576 |
38 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $26,101 |
39 | John Sloan | Diboll, TX 75941 | $25,476 |
40 | Charles Dewitt Williams Jr | Fairfield, VA 24435 | $25,376 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”